Aesthetic Clinic SEOa curriculum for clinics Part II · Module 08 of 32
Module 08Part II · Positioning

Reading the local market without naming names

You need to understand the clinics around you. You must not write about them. This module is about how to do the first without doing the second.

Reading time
21 minutes reading
Exercise
60 minutes
Level
Core
Part
II. Positioning

PrerequisitesModule 06 · The propositionModule 07 · Choosing treatments

In brief

Read your local market by studying what is already published and what is missing from it, not by ranking or reviewing the clinics that published it. Comparative claims about named competitors require substantiation you almost certainly cannot produce and invite complaints. The useful output of market reading is a list of questions nobody in your area has answered properly, which becomes your build list.

Figure plate: local, an instructional still life drawn from the publication's plate series
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do

By the end of this module you will be able to:

  1. Survey the published material in your catchment without producing a comparative claim.
  2. Identify unanswered questions and underserved stages of the patient journey locally.
  3. Explain why ranked lists of clinics are a liability rather than an asset.
  4. Convert market observations into a build list rather than into advertising copy.

Two views of the same market

There are two useful ways to look at the clinics around you, and they answer different questions. The plan view asks what exists: how many clinics, offering what, at what apparent price level, with what visibility. The elevation view asks what is missing: which questions nobody answers, which stages of the journey nobody serves, which patient group nobody addresses.

planelevation
Figure 8.1 Plan and elevation. Most competitor research produces only the plan, which tells you what is there and nothing about where to stand.

Clinics almost always do the plan and stop, which produces a list of competitors and a vague sense of being outgunned. The elevation is the useful one, because gaps are actionable and headcounts are not.

What to look at

Work from what is publicly published, in your catchment, for the treatments on your build list from Module 07, Choosing the treatments to compete on. For each, note the following without recording clinic names in anything you will publish.

  • Depth. Is the typical page a few hundred words of brochure copy, or is it substantial? This tells you what it will take to be the best answer.
  • Coverage. Which of the six journey stages from Module 03, The patient journey, from symptom to booking are served? Almost always stages four to six only.
  • Questions answered. Which of the six question families from Module 15 are addressed anywhere in your area?
  • Price transparency. Does anybody publish a range with the variables named?
  • Assurance material. Are practitioners named with roles and registration?

An hour of this is worth more than any paid competitive analysis, because you are reading the same pages a patient reads, in the same order.

What you may never publish

The survey is for you. Almost none of it may be published, and the reasons are both regulatory and practical.

Comparative claims about identified competitors must be capable of substantiation and must not mislead. In practice a clinic cannot substantiate a claim that it is better than a named competitor, because it has not assessed that competitor's work and could not do so lawfully or meaningfully. The CAP Code treats denigration and unsubstantiated comparison seriously, and a complaint from a named competitor is the easiest complaint in the world to make.

This publication does not rank clinics or agencies, and neither should your clinic's website. A ranked list you cannot substantiate is a liability dressed as content.

The same applies to any "top clinics" or "best in town" list, whether or not you appear on it. If you did not assess the businesses on it against stated criteria you can produce, you have published an advertisement in the shape of an article, and the fact that it ranks well is not a defence.

Finding the gaps

A gap is a question a patient in your area is asking that nobody local answers well. Three kinds recur.

Stage gaps. Nobody serves the symptom stage. Everybody has a page named after the procedure and nobody has a page named after the thing the patient sees in the mirror.

Question gaps. Everybody answers what a treatment is. Almost nobody answers what happens if you do not like the result, who pays for correction, or what the two weeks afterwards actually feel like.

Group gaps. Everybody writes to the same implied reader. Nobody writes to the person who is nervous about looking treated, or the person with a specific medical history, or the person who has had a poor experience elsewhere and is frightened of a second one.

Positioning against a gap

Positioning against a gap means occupying it, not announcing it. You do not write "unlike other clinics, we explain recovery properly". You write the recovery explanation, thoroughly, and let the absence elsewhere speak.

This is a discipline, and it is the difference between a publication a patient trusts and a brochure they discount. It is also the safer route under every rule in Module 05, The rules that constrain everything you publish, because a page that describes only your own practice makes no comparative claim at all.

Keeping the survey current

Once a quarter, an hour, the same five columns. Markets move slowly and the point is not to react quickly; it is to notice when a gap you occupy is being closed, which usually happens over several quarters and is invisible if you only look once.

Record the survey in a private document with dates. Never publish it, never quote it in marketing, and do not let it become an anxiety exercise. Its only purpose is to keep the build list in Module 07, Choosing the treatments to compete on pointed at territory where you can win.

Exercise 8

The gap survey

An hour, private, and it stays private. You need your build list from Module 7 and a spreadsheet with five columns.

  1. Choose the three treatments highest on your build list.
  2. For each, read the first ten results for the obvious local search, as a patient would. Do not record clinic names in any document you might later publish.
  3. Score each result against the five headings in section two: depth, coverage, questions answered, price transparency, assurance material.
  4. Write down every question you found asked but not answered. This list is the most valuable output of the exercise.
  5. Choose the three gaps you are best placed to fill and add them to your build list with a date.

Diarise a repeat in three months. The workbook contains a ruled survey sheet and a reminder of what may not be published from it.

Questions readers ask about this module

Can I ever mention a competitor by name?

There are narrow circumstances, such as correcting a factual matter of public record, and they almost never arise in clinic marketing. The working rule for a clinic website is simple: describe your own practice, name nobody else. It removes an entire category of risk at no cost to the reader.

What about comparison pages between treatments?

Comparing treatments is legitimate and useful, and Module 17 sets out how to do it responsibly. Comparing businesses is the thing to avoid. The distinction is between comparing things you can describe factually and comparing organisations you have not assessed.

Should I respond publicly if a competitor makes a claim I know to be false?

The route for that is a complaint to the relevant regulator, not a page on your website. Publishing a rebuttal turns a factual matter into a dispute in which you are a party, and readers discount both sides.

How large should my catchment be for this survey?

Whatever distance patients actually travel to you, which you can find out by asking them. It is usually smaller than clinic owners assume, and treating it as larger produces the doorway page problem covered in Module 26.

Sources and primary references

  1. Committee of Advertising Practice, the UK Advertising Codes
  2. Advertising Standards Authority, Advice Online
  3. Google Search Central, Spam policies for Google web search
  4. Google Business Profile Help, Improve your local ranking on Google

Disclosure. This module contains no commercial links of any kind. This course is published by Northbank Media, is free to read, and is funded by the workbook pack and by clearly labelled series sponsorship. We do not rank, review or recommend agencies or clinics.

Module 08 of 32