The treatment page carries most of a clinic's commercial search demand. It has a correct shape, and the shape is not the one most clinics use.
PrerequisitesModule 01 · What a clinic sellsModule 02 · Who decidesModule 05 · The rulesModule 09 · The site plan
A treatment page has ten blocks in a fixed order: the treatment named plainly, a direct answer, who it suits and who it does not, what happens step by step, risks, aftercare, price with its variables, who performs it, the questions patients ask, and one clear next step. Ordering matters more than wording, because a patient reads until their current question is answered and then stops.

By the end of this module you will be able to:
If a clinic site has one page type worth doing properly, it is this one. It answers the query with the highest commercial intent, it is the page a patient forwards to the person whose opinion they want, and it is the page that decides whether an enquiry is well informed or a waste of everybody's afternoon.
It is also the page type most often written from the manufacturer's literature, in the manufacturer's voice, about the manufacturer's concerns. That version answers almost none of the questions a patient actually has.
Each block has a specific job and a specific failure mode.
One H1, using the words a patient would use, subject to the constraint in Module 05, The rules that constrain everything you publish about prescription-only medicines. Not a slogan, not the clinic name, not a question.
Two sentences saying what the treatment is and what it does. Complete on its own, so that somebody who reads nothing else still knows what they are looking at. Module 11, The opening 120 words is devoted to this block.
Eligibility before persuasion. This block does more to build trust than any other, because it demonstrates the judgement described in Module 01, What an aesthetic clinic actually sells.
The appointment described in sequence: arrival, assessment, consent, the procedure itself, how long each part takes, what it feels like. Written as a description, not a reassurance.
Stated, not buried, and covered properly in Module 13, Risks, suitability and aftercare. A page that omits this is not merely incomplete; it is at odds with the consent standards its own practitioners work to.
What the next fortnight looks like, in time order, with the three lists: expected, call us, seek urgent care.
A range with the variables named, treated in full in Module 12, Price, and what you may say about it.
Name, role, registration, how long they have been doing this. This block serves the influencer described in Module 2 and it is the block most often missing.
Answered on the page, in the reader's words, not linked away to a separate page.
A consultation, stated once, without pressure or urgency.
Because a patient reads linearly and stops when satisfied, and because the questions arrive in a predictable sequence: what is it, is it for me, what happens, what could go wrong, what then, how much, who does it, and finally what do I do now.
Putting price at the end is the most common ordering error and it is expensive. A reader who cannot find a number scrolls looking for one, and scrolling to look for something is the behaviour immediately preceding leaving. Putting the practitioner block above the treatment information is the second most common, and it fails because a reader who has not yet decided what they want does not care who you are.
Rebuilding a page to this structure usually removes more than it adds. The material that should go, in order of how often it appears:
The last one deserves a note. Repeating the booking prompt does not increase bookings; it increases the impression that the page is an advertisement, which reduces them. One prompt, at the end, plus a persistent way to contact you, is sufficient.
There is no correct word count and there never was. What exists is a correct amount of information, which is however much it takes to answer the ten blocks properly for that treatment. For a simple procedure that might be eight hundred words. For a complex one with real risk profile and several variants it might be three thousand.
Padding a page to reach a number produces exactly the kind of content Google's guidance on helpful, people-first content describes as written for search engines rather than people. The reverse error, cutting a page to a few hundred words for the sake of brevity, leaves the reader with unanswered questions and sends them elsewhere to answer them.
Write until the ten blocks are answered. Then stop. The length is whatever that took.
One H1, which is the treatment name. H2 for each block. H3 only for genuine subdivisions inside a block. This is not a styling decision; it is the outline a machine uses to understand what sections the page contains, and it is what allows a specific section to be surfaced for a specific question.
Write the H2s as the questions they answer where that reads naturally. "Who this is not suitable for" is a better H2 than "Contraindications", because it matches how the question is asked and because it does not require the reader to know a word they may not know.
The exercise for this module is a full rebuild of one page, and it takes about two hours the first time. It gets faster: by the fourth page the structure is automatic and the work is entirely in the writing.
Do not rebuild all of your treatment pages at once. Rebuild one, publish it, and leave it for a quarter while you build others. That gives you something to compare against, and it prevents the common failure where a clinic changes everything simultaneously and can never work out which change mattered.
Two hours. Choose the treatment at the top of your build list from Module 7. Work in a document, not on the live site.
Keep the deleted material in a separate file for a month. You will find you want almost none of it back, and knowing that makes the next rebuild much faster.
Every one needs blocks one to six and eight to ten. Block seven, price, is required wherever you can give a range, and Module 12 deals with the narrow cases where you genuinely cannot. A page missing eligibility, risk or aftercare is incomplete regardless of the treatment.
The skeleton is the same, which is a feature: a returning reader knows where to find things. The content of each block is entirely different per treatment, and the pages read as differently as the treatments are different. Consistency of structure is what a textbook does, and for the same reason.
Photographs of the clinic and the practitioner belong near block eight. Before and after images, if used at all, belong near block four or six and are governed by the rules in Module 18. Stock photography belongs nowhere.
No. A concern page has a different shape because its reader has a different question, and Module 9 explains the distinction. The temptation to reuse this structure everywhere is worth resisting.
Disclosure. This module contains no commercial links of any kind. This course is published by Northbank Media, is free to read, and is funded by the workbook pack and by clearly labelled series sponsorship. We do not rank, review or recommend agencies or clinics.
Module 10 of 32