The page for every town within thirty miles is the most common bad idea in local marketing. This module explains why it fails and what to do instead.
PrerequisitesModule 09 · The site planModule 25 · Business Profile
Build a location page only where you have premises, and give it substance the patient can use: the address, how to get there, parking, which practitioners work there, which treatments are available there, and the opening hours for that site. Pages generated for towns you do not operate in are doorway pages, they are explicitly against search engine guidance, and they are also useless to the reader who lands on them.

By the end of this module you will be able to:
A doorway page is one of a set of pages created to rank for variations of a query, where the pages differ only in the substituted term and all funnel to the same destination. In clinic marketing this is nearly always a page per town, identical apart from the place name, each linking to the same single clinic.
Google's spam policies name doorway pages specifically. This is not a grey area and it has not been one for a long time, which is worth knowing before somebody sells you a package of forty location pages.
Three reasons, of which only the first is about search engines.
The first is that they are detected. Sets of near-identical pages are exactly the pattern that duplicate detection is built to resolve, and the usual outcome is that one is indexed and the rest are ignored, which means the effort produced one page.
The second is that they are useless to the reader. Somebody who lands on a page headed with the name of their town, which then describes a clinic eighteen miles away without saying so, has been misled. They leave, and the behaviour is visible.
The third is that they crowd out the pages that would have worked. A site with forty location pages and eight treatment pages has told a search engine, structurally, that it is mostly about places. It is not; it is about treatments.
One test: do you have premises there, where a patient can attend an appointment. If yes, the page is justified and necessary. If no, it is not, and there is no clever version of it that becomes justified.
The edge cases are genuinely narrow. A practitioner holding regular clinics at a second site one day a week is a location, provided the page says so plainly and gives the days. A referral arrangement is not a location. A postal address for correspondence is not a location.
A page containing all seven is substantial, useful and impossible to generate by substituting a town name. That is the point: the test of a location page is whether it could exist for a town you do not operate in. If it could, it should not exist at all.
Patients travel, and a clinic legitimately serves a wider area than the town it sits in. Four ways to serve that catchment that are not doorway pages.
The fourth is slow and it is the one that works. A clinic known well enough that people travel to it has solved the catchment problem permanently, and no page programme substitutes for it.
Many clinics arrive at this module with thirty location pages already published, usually built by an agency several years ago. The remedy is a consolidation and it uses the technique from Module 22, URLs, redirects and migrations.
Keep the pages for premises you have. Redirect the rest to the single page that is genuinely most equivalent, which is usually the treatment page they were funnelling towards or the nearest real location page. Do not delete them without redirects, and do not redirect them all to the homepage, which is the mistake Module 22, URLs, redirects and migrations warns about.
Expect the total number of pages to fall substantially and expect nothing bad to happen, because pages that were not indexed and not read were not producing anything to lose.
An hour. If you have no location pages, use the time to write one proper page for your actual premises.
Removing pages feels like losing something. Check their impressions in Search Console first; in most cases you will find they had almost none, which makes the decision easy.
Check whether the traffic is to one or two of them or spread across all thirty. Usually one has been indexed and the rest have not, in which case you are keeping one page and twenty-nine liabilities. Keep the one, if it is for premises you have, and consolidate the rest.
If it contains real information a patient in that town needs, and it is not one of a set of near-identical pages, it is not a doorway page. The real test is whether you would write it if it had no search value. Most such pages fail that test.
Some of them will be getting away with it, for now. Building your site on a pattern named in the spam policies means the strategy has an expiry date set by somebody else. Module 8 covers why competitor behaviour is a poor guide generally.
Yes, where each is a distinct premises that a patient attends. Each profile needs its own accurate details, and each should link to its own location page rather than to the homepage.
Disclosure. This module contains no commercial links of any kind. This course is published by Northbank Media, is free to read, and is funded by the workbook pack and by clearly labelled series sponsorship. We do not rank, review or recommend agencies or clinics.
Module 26 of 32